Aleš Pogačnik - Science should be open, right?

elpub:5530 - ELectronic PUBlishing, June 11, 2019, Academic publishing and digital bibliodiversity - https://doi.org/10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.13
Science should be open, right?

Authors: Aleš Pogačnik ORCID-iD

    What does “open science” mean to researchers? A survey of researchers at the Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU) suggests some interesting conclusions, particularly as far as the humanities are concerned. According to the responses, most of these researchers are in favour of open science as a matter of personal conviction. However, when it comes to publishing their own work, hardly any would consent to being published under some basic conditions of open science (adaptation, commercial use). Furthermore, they do appreciate subscription-based e-libraries, although they admit to using other methods, e.g. “resourcefulness”, to gain access to research papers. They would rather not pay to be published or to acquire an e-article of a fellow researcher. They read predominantly in English, with the second language of their research literature being Slovenian (before any other language). Even the most productive age group (40–50 years of age) write more articles than they perform peer-reviewing. They do not support open reviews, yet they consider peer-reviews to be very important; in their opinion peer-reviewing should be included in their evaluation. The survey and its results are just a minor example from a European country, but they have a very clear and universal message: open science is something yet to be defined.


    Volume: Academic publishing and digital bibliodiversity
    Section: Short Papers
    Published on: June 11, 2019
    Imported on: May 31, 2019
    Keywords: survey,open science,Slovenia,[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences

    Share

    Consultation statistics

    This page has been seen 300 times.
    This article's PDF has been downloaded 147 times.