<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Episciences.org TEI export of elpub:5537 - ElPub - ELectronic PUBlishing, 2019-06-11, Academic publishing and digital bibliodiversity</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><distributor>CCSD - Episciences</distributor><availability status="restricted"><licence target="https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1">Hal authorisation v1</licence></availability><date when="2019-06-11"/></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><p>Episciences.org API platform</p></sourceDesc></fileDesc></teiHeader><text><body><listBibl><biblFull><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The significant difference in impact: An exploratory study about the meaning and value of metrics for open access monographs</title><author role="aut"><persName><forename type="first">Sofie</forename><surname>Wennström</surname></persName><email/><affiliation ref="#struct-0"/></author><author role="aut"><persName><forename type="first">Gabor</forename><surname>Schubert</surname></persName><email/><affiliation ref="#struct-0"/></author><author role="aut"><persName><forename type="first">Graham</forename><surname>Stone</surname></persName><email/><idno type="ORCID">0000-0002-5189-373X</idno><affiliation ref="#struct-1"/></author><author role="aut"><persName><forename type="first">Jeroen</forename><surname>Sondervan</surname></persName><email/><affiliation ref="#struct-2"/><affiliation ref="#struct-3"/></author></titleStmt><editionStmt><edition><date type="whenSubmitted">2019-05-31 07:21:49</date><date type="whenProduced">2019-06-11 09:06:51</date><ref type="file" target="http://elpub.episciences.org/5537/pdf"/></edition><respStmt><resp>contributor</resp><name key="630180"><persName><forename>OpenEdition</forename><surname>Press</surname></persName><email>press@openedition.org</email></name></respStmt></editionStmt><publicationStmt><distributor>CCSD</distributor><idno type="id">elpub:5537</idno><idno type="url">http://elpub.episciences.org/5537</idno><idno type="ref">elpub:5537 - ElPub - ELectronic PUBlishing, 2019-06-11, Academic publishing and digital bibliodiversity</idno><licence target="https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1">Hal authorisation v1</licence></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The significant difference in impact: An exploratory study about the meaning and value of metrics for open access monographs</title><author role="aut"><persName><forename type="first">Sofie</forename><surname>Wennström</surname></persName><email/><affiliation ref="#struct-0"/></author><author role="aut"><persName><forename type="first">Gabor</forename><surname>Schubert</surname></persName><email/><affiliation ref="#struct-0"/></author><author role="aut"><persName><forename type="first">Graham</forename><surname>Stone</surname></persName><email/><idno type="ORCID">0000-0002-5189-373X</idno><affiliation ref="#struct-1"/></author><author role="aut"><persName><forename type="first">Jeroen</forename><surname>Sondervan</surname></persName><email/><affiliation ref="#struct-2"/><affiliation ref="#struct-3"/></author></analytic><monogr><idno type="HAL">hal-02141879</idno><title level="j">ElPub - ELectronic PUBlishing</title><imprint><publisher/><biblScope unit="volume">Academic publishing and digital bibliodiversity</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">Short Papers</biblScope><date type="datePub">2019-06-11T09:06:51+02:00</date></imprint></monogr><idno type="doi">10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.9</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><profileDesc><langUsage><language ident="en">English</language></langUsage><textClass><keywords scheme="author"><term>impact</term><term>open access</term><term>monographs</term><term>books</term><term>mixed method</term><term>altmetrics</term><term>metrics</term><term>[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences</term></keywords></textClass><abstract><p>International audience</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper analyses usage statistics, citation data and altmetrics from a university press publishing open access monographs. The bibliometric data is then contrasted to the outcome of a survey of attitudes and behaviour among authors and editors who have published open access books. The metrics indicate that downloads and citations depend on the community of practice of the intended audience within each specific academic discipline, as well as the content itself. There is, for example, a clear difference in usage patterns between monographs and anthologies. The altmetric data used in the study indicate how users interact with the published books online. The data suggests, despite the small sample, that authors can to a greater extent influence how their book is discovered by the readership. It would, therefore, be relevant for authors to become more aware of the type of metrics available and how they can be interpreted and used for better understanding of how the book can reach its intended audience. Further studies are needed, and publishers of open access books are encouraged to share data for benchmarking and development of best practices.</p></abstract></profileDesc></biblFull></listBibl></body><back><listOrg><org xml:id="struct-0"><orgName>Stockholm University Library</orgName></org><org xml:id="struct-1"><orgName>JISC</orgName></org><org xml:id="struct-2"><idno type="ROR">https://ror.org/04pp8hn57</idno><orgName>Universiteit Utrecht / Utrecht University [Utrecht]</orgName></org><org xml:id="struct-3"><idno type="ROR">https://ror.org/04pp8hn57</idno><orgName>Utrecht University [Utrecht]</orgName></org></listOrg></back></text></TEI>