<resource xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:datacite="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4" xmlns:oaire="http://namespace.openaire.eu/schema/oaire/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://namespace.openaire.eu/schema/oaire/ https://www.openaire.eu/schema/repo-lit/4.0/openaire.xsd"><datacite:identifier identifierType="DOI">10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.10</datacite:identifier><datacite:alternateIdentifiers><datacite:alternateIdentifier alternateIdentifierType="URL">http://elpub.episciences.org/5561</datacite:alternateIdentifier></datacite:alternateIdentifiers><datacite:creators><datacite:creator><datacite:creatorName>Willinsky, John</datacite:creatorName><datacite:givenName>John</datacite:givenName><datacite:familyName>Willinsky</datacite:familyName><datacite:affiliation>Stanford University</datacite:affiliation><datacite:nameIdentifier nameIdentifierScheme="ROR" schemeURI="https://ror.org/">https://ror.org/00f54p054</datacite:nameIdentifier></datacite:creator></datacite:creators><datacite:titles><datacite:title xml:lang="en">If, Alongside Libraries, Funders Pulled Their Weight: A Study in Universal Open Access</datacite:title></datacite:titles><dc:description xml:lang="en">This demonstration study sets out the way in which a model for open access can work in which funders pay the portion of publishing costs associated with the articles that acknowledge research funder. Using the field of anthropology, this analysis presents the participation incentives and advantages behind of an open access model in which a journal article’s publication costs are paid by either (a) the research funder(s) acknowledged by the article or, if without a funder, (b) the libraries whose patrons read and utilize the research. Using both hypothetical and actual examples, the paper describes how the existing metadata systems such as Crossref’s Open Funder Registry can be utilized to automate the implementation of the model. It also addresses the model’s economic impact, from an initial pilot study to large-scale implementation, for the principal stakeholders in scholarly communication.</dc:description><datacite:subjects><datacite:subject subjectScheme="author">Open access</datacite:subject><datacite:subject subjectScheme="author">Scholarly publishing economics</datacite:subject><datacite:subject subjectScheme="author">Research funding</datacite:subject><datacite:subject subjectScheme="author">[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences</datacite:subject></datacite:subjects><oaire:licenseCondition startDate="2019-06-11 09:06:02" uri="https://about.hal.science/hal-authorisation-v1">Hal authorisation v1</oaire:licenseCondition><datacite:dates><datacite:date dateType="Accepted">2019-06-11</datacite:date><datacite:date dateType="Issued">2019-06-11</datacite:date><datacite:date dateType="Available">2019-06-11</datacite:date></datacite:dates><dc:language>eng</dc:language><oaire:resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="literature" uri="http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501">journal        article    </oaire:resourceType><datacite:relatedIdentifiers><datacite:relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType="URL" relationType="IsIdenticalTo">https://hal.science/hal-02143129v1</datacite:relatedIdentifier></datacite:relatedIdentifiers><datacite:rights rightsURI="http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2">open access</datacite:rights><oaire:file accessRightsURI="http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2" mimeType="application/pdf" objectType="fulltext">http://elpub.episciences.org/5561/pdf</oaire:file><oaire:version uri="http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85">VoR</oaire:version><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><oaire:citationTitle>ElPub - ELectronic PUBlishing</oaire:citationTitle><oaire:citationVolume>Academic publishing and digital bibliodiversity</oaire:citationVolume><oaire:citationIssue>Short Papers</oaire:citationIssue><dcterms:audience>Researchers</dcterms:audience><dcterms:audience>Students</dcterms:audience></resource>