Repositories at Bibliodiversity Stakes: Community ApproachesBoukacem-Zeghmouri, ChérifaBerthaud, ChristineChristine BerthaudElPub - ELectronic PUBlishingEpisciences.orghttp://elpub.episciences.org/6025info:doi:10.46298/elpub.6025elpub:6025 - ElPub - ELectronic PUBlishing, 2020-01-14, Academic publishing and digital bibliodiversityenrepositoriesopennessinteroperabilitybrandvalueresearch communitiesmegajournalsbibliodiversityartefacts[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResearchersGreen Road is deeply anchored in the scholarly communication system. Based on the analysis of a panel of 6 repositories, the study identify strategies repositories have adopted in order to meet or adjust to Open Science requirements in terms of bibliodiversity. Typically, thematic repositories are not only concerned with articles but also consider new artefacts, linked and interlinked. Research outcomes suggest reconsidering the term “repository” as it no longer seems relevant to our panel.2020-01-14