<records><record><language>eng</language><journalTitle>ElPub - ELectronic PUBlishing</journalTitle><publicationDate>2020-01-14</publicationDate><volume>Academic publishing and...</volume><issue>Practitioner Papers</issue><doi>10.46298/elpub.6025</doi><publisherRecordId>6025</publisherRecordId><documentType>journal article</documentType><title language="eng">Repositories at Bibliodiversity Stakes: Community Approaches</title><authors><author><name>Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri</name><affiliationId>0</affiliationId><orcid_id>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-6159</orcid_id></author><author><name>Christine Berthaud</name><affiliationId>1</affiliationId><orcid_id>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3104-2858</orcid_id></author></authors><affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="0">Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1</affiliationName><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Green Road is deeply anchored in the scholarly communication system. Based on the analysis of a panel of 6 repositories, the study identify strategies repositories have adopted in order to meet or adjust to Open Science requirements in terms of bibliodiversity. Typically, thematic repositories are not only concerned with articles but also consider new artefacts, linked and interlinked. Research outcomes suggest reconsidering the term “repository” as it no longer seems relevant to our panel.</abstract><fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://elpub.episciences.org/6025/pdf</fullTextUrl><keywords><keyword>repositories</keyword><keyword>openness</keyword><keyword>interoperability</keyword><keyword>brand</keyword><keyword>value</keyword><keyword>research communities</keyword><keyword>megajournals</keyword><keyword>bibliodiversity</keyword><keyword>artefacts</keyword><keyword>[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences</keyword></keywords></record></records>