<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title xml:lang="en">Towards a typology of edited books and conference proceedings according to the applied peer-review procedures</dc:title><dc:creator>Zlodi, Iva, Melinščak</dc:creator><dc:contributor>Openedition Press</dc:contributor><dc:source>ElPub - ELectronic PUBlishing</dc:source><dc:source>Episciences.org</dc:source><dc:identifier>http://elpub.episciences.org/6300</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>info:doi:10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2020.8</dc:identifier><dc:source>elpub:6300 - ElPub - ELectronic PUBlishing, 2020-04-18, Charting The Futures(s) of Digital Publishing</dc:source><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:subject>conference proceedings</dc:subject><dc:subject>edited books</dc:subject><dc:subject>peer-review</dc:subject><dc:subject>[SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences</dc:subject><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:type>Journal articles</dc:type><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type><dc:audience>Researchers</dc:audience><dc:description xml:lang="en">In the last years here is an increasing need to ensure a more objective and transparent evaluationof scientific research in the Humanities and Social Sciences. This short paper explores some ofthe underlying issues and suggests a study using the suvey method based on a sample of 146publications. The results of this study could contribute to the identification and describingdistinctive types of edited books and conference proceedings according to their peer-reviewprocedures, and thus to facilitate the recognition of their scholarly value and reliability.</dc:description><publisher/><dc:date>2020-04-18</dc:date></oai_dc:dc>